12/13/2023 0 Comments Fa18 how to reset launchbar dcs![]() ![]() I feel more like I'm guessing in the F/A-18C when I raise/lower the elevation. I don't know if that's a real feature, and if it is, if the F/A-18C had it and, if so, if it will be added in the future. Yeah, the F-15C's radar in the game has that nice set up with two carrots and the altitudes it's scanning between depending on wherever you have your TDC slewed to for distance. the f-15's two dots, why the 1 carrot when changing elevation? Why not two so you have a CLEAR picture on where your radar cone is pointing.Īlso Still not sure what the radar "bars" do when you increase the amount, does that change the cone direction? so it was pretty easy to understandį-18 however, from what I'm watching from videos, the only way to change where the elevation of the radar beam is apparently by using your cursor, is this true? Will I have to always move my cursor around to check different elevations?Įdit: I figured out you could do the same thing in the F-18 without moving the cursor, but there is only 1 carrot when you change the elevation vs. On the F-15 you would have two dots on your left side of the radar that you could move up or down manually so you didn't HAVE to move your cursor and could just keep it centered. Which is why you don't see the China copy version KJ-600 never landed nor taken off from Type 001 and 002 due to too risky for high asset value aircraft.I'm moving from the F-15 to the F-18 and i have a grasp on most things on how the radar works except how to change the elevation of where my radar beam is looking In reality the E-2 Hawkeye can't really take off from Kuznetsov nor Type-001 and 002. So by the time Type-003 is ready, PLAN will proceed to build 2-4 sister ships and kickstart J-15B/D and J-35 production. It is believed that the J-15A is the fastest most aerodynamic Flanker with top speed of Mach 2.4.Ĭhina main focus is on the Type 003 Fujian aircraft carrier and the new J-15B/D fitted with WS-10C and AESA radar, J-35, KJ-600 are taking off from mock Type 003 flight deck. Also, the J-15A is designed for speed therefore carrier landing is not safe with higher approach speed. At most they could load up to 15,000lb of internal fuel getting poor combat radius due to too much fuel wasted on take off alone. ![]() The J-15A could only take off with max take off weight 60,000lb with less than 12,000lb fuel and 6 pylons loaded with air to air missiles or 2x anti-ship missiles and 2 or 4 air to air missiles only. The main reason why PLAN J-11A is still fitted with Russian AL-31F and pulse doppler radar because it is just temporary for carrier operations testing and training pilots rather than for war. Ski ramp aircraft carrier doesn't work in reality and proven too ineffective. China do only copies of everything) Ant the main reason why everyone wants EMALS is because it saves a lot of space. I am quite sure there is like 10 years time until they will be able to copy this system properly (like everything else. Quite impractical for naval ops because you have to send the air taker from the land first.īTW it took over 10 years of development of the EMALS. If you want to take off with fully loaded SU-33, you need to take of with very small ammount of fuel and then perform aerial refuelling. The E-2 Hawkeye is the heaviest aircraft which is possible to take off from Admiral Kuznetsov or from Liaononing (Liaononing is the fully functional Chineese version of Admiral Kuznetsov. Russian carrier is suited only for russian carrier aircrafts. ![]() And the ski Jump is much less effective than launch bar. Originally posted by Troll Norris:Simply: Russian Carrier Admiral Kuznetsov is much smaller. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |